Posts Tagged ‘Stanford Law School’

Remember This Blog’s “Totally Silly” Idea about Solving California Prison Overcrowding, the Belgians and Dutch Did Not Think The Idea was “Totally Silly”

Monday, July 26th, 2010

This blog has long maintained that one of the solutions to over crowding in California prisons, is the building of prisons in Mexico to house California prisoners who are illegal immigrants.
 
http://gerrymaxeyworkshop.com/blogging/?p=3201

In its February 11, 2010 issue, THE ECONOMIST, did an article about overcrowding in California prisons,the following is a quote from that article:
 
The governor’s wildest thought experiment has California paying Mexico to build prisons and house California’s inmates in them. This is “totally silly” and probably unconstitutional, says Joan Petersilia of Stanford Law School”.

http://gerrymaxeyworkshop.com/blogging/?p=3441

One of the most interesting arcs of California politics during the first decade of the 21st Century has been the gelding of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger as a political mover and shaker. 

He was presented, by this Blog, with a bold idea to help alleviate the over crowding in California Prisons, and he saw the value of it. The stud Schwarzenegger would have gone for it and tried it. The gelded Schwarzenegger became Arnold Stang( for my Generation X and Generation Y readers, Mr. Stang was a man of very weak body measurements), as soon as a Law Professor, a Law Professor, called the plan silly, “totally silly.”

While this Blog’s  California Prison Plan was being called totally silly, check out what was happening in Belgium and The Netherlands. 

“…. The Dutch prison population has been falling for some years and, with 14,000 cells for 12,000 prisoners, the government last year decided to close eight jails. But in Belgium the numbers locked up keep rising, causing serious overcrowding.

On February 5th this year, the Dutch and Belgian governments drew the logical conclusion, and agreed on a deal. Belgium took possession of the Dutch prison of Tilburg, a modern affair with tennis courts and a football pitch but a chronic shortage of residents.

For a rent of €30m a year, 500 Belgian prisoners now live behind Tilburg’s barbed wire. The governor is Belgian, most of the guards are Dutch. At first there was grumbling about language (some of the Belgian prisoners speak French, not Dutch) and ease of access (many supplies come from the nearest Belgian prison, 40km—25 miles—away). Now the arrangement causes little fuss.”THE ECONOMIST

What is silly for California is logical for the Dutch and Belgians?

California’s Governor, who has been a bodybuilder, businessman,movie star and politician, backed down to a cloistered Law Professor, and allowed the “girlie men” of Holland and Belgium do the logical thing.

How in the hell can the Dutch and the Belgians, makers of cheese and candy be bolder than Californians? What in the hell has happened to us? Governor, what in the hell has happened to you? If not the gelding?

The Law Professors Are At It Again: Big Ideas Are “Totally Silly”

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

This blog has long maintained that one of the solutions to over crowding in California prisons, is the building of prisons in Mexico to house California prisoners who are illegal immigrants.
 
http://gerrymaxeyworkshop.com/blogging/?p=3201
 
In its February 11, 2010 issue, my all time favorite magazine, THE ECONOMIST, did an article about overcrowding in California prisons,the following is a quote from that article:
 
The governor’s wildest thought experiment has California paying Mexico to build prisons and house California’s inmates in them. This is “totally silly” and probably unconstitutional, says Joan Petersilia of Stanford Law School”

So here we have an idea, an innovation, a concept and the Law Professor, excuse me, the  Law Professor at Stanford (The Harvard of the West)  thinks it is silly.
 
It may well be unconstitutional,but then  so was the Income Tax, the Louisiana Purchase, Women’s Right to Vote, and Black folks’ right to stay free from slave catchers(see Dred Scott vs. Sandford) .  The purpose of law professors, at Stanford, is to make the innovative CONSTITUTIONAL
 
The criticism comes from Stanford, producer of Herbert Hoover, a good,and brilliant man who NEVER had one innovative idea to get us out of a crisis, in his case, The Great Depression.
 
Stanford’s concept of BIG IDEAS, and innovation  ends with their student band.
 
As for silly….I would rather seek advice from Jane Austen than a Law Professor.

 
“Silly things do cease to be silly if they are done by sensible people in an impudent way”, JANE AUSTEN
 
The Governor is a sensible man, who has been bold and impudent in his actions,….silly ceases to be silly when that occurs.
 
On a more practical, pragmatic basis….is the idea really silly?
 
“The economist Lant Pritchett has a shorthand by which he describes the evolving patterns of social acceptance of so-called “big ideas”: Silly, controversial, progressive, then obvious.”
 
There has been many BIG IDEAS deemed silly;
 
“David John of the Heritage Foundation … says Obama’s proposed banking reforms are ’silly’”.
 
“….Men treated women as inferior, they treated women as not intelligent, weak, frail and ’silly’…”
 
As we celebrate Abe Lincoln’s birthday, let us all, including the Governor and the Law Professor remember what the Chicago Times said about the Gettysburg Address, the day after it was given, 
Chicago newspaper, The Times, called it “silly, flat and dishwatery.”
 
Attack the idea as unworkable, ill advised, too expensive,  but spare the people of California, desperately seeking new ideas, and innovations to surmount our seemingly intractable problems,  the weak criticism of a mediocre mentality, ….”The idea is totally silly”.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Subscribe
Content Protected by WP-Content Protector By PcDrome.