Please See “Män Som Hatar Kvinnor” , THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO
Tuesday, July 13th, 2010“Män Som Hatar Kvinnor” is the original title, in Swedish, of a Swedish film currently in release, THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO.
The Swedish title is more, well….. appropriate , “Män som hatar kvinnor” – “Men Who Hate Women”.
It is a great film.
Three general impressions
A) THE LOSS OF THE YOUNG GIRL For some strange reason this film reminded me of the Australian film, Peter Weir’s PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK, and Ingmar Bergman’s THE VIRGIN SPRING. The films give you young girls of beauty, kindness and promise, then they are disappeared.
An amputee who has lost his leg always imagines he can feel the lost leg, even when it is gone; that is how the world reacts when young girls are snatched away from life before fulfillment. Society is use to losing young men before maturity, that is what 5,000 years of war has been about; but there is still poignant pain in the collective heart when a young girl is denied dance lessons, grand balls, romance, courtship, a wedding, childbirth. The community’s heart is amputated.
The death of a young girl abbreviates the life off all of us, it is like nurturing water being poured into the sand for no reason. There is nothing more powerful in literature than the death or disappearance of a young girl. Thornton Wilder knew what he was doing when he killed off EMILY WEBB in OUR TOWN.
The history of Western civilization has been very simple, young men are replaceable, young women are irreplaceable.
B) VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
This Swedish film contains the most violent, abusive scene against women since the French film, IRREVERSIBLE. In that debased French film, the gorgeous Monica Bellucci is violated to a disgusting extreme in a Paris underpass.
The original Swedish title is much more accurate in encapsulating the film’s themes than the American title, which is a cuddly platitude. The theme of the film is about MEN WHO HATE WOMEN. In the first thirty minutes there are three violent incidents against the female protagonist.
She is beaten, seemingly randomly, by a group of male thugs in a underpass, while all the civilized people in Sweden stand around or go about their civilized business, without interfering.
The origin of the film is a Swedish novel by the late Stieg Larsson, a left wing Swedish journalist( think the personfication of all those milquetoast left wing talking heads on MSNBC, with a Swedish accent).
Some analysts and critics say all this violence is the writer’s hidden male fantasies finally given voice. That the violence in the art is drawn from the author’s twisted pornographic fantasy life.
I beg to differ. I think what Larsson was after was revelatory; that underneath all this modernity, civilization, and social welfare, just under the surface is a brutality and meanness toward women worthy of Faulkner. His violence is not some Norman Mailer crap, but Faulknerian. Men, the male, whether he is a gang banger, or thug, or baseball player or Swedish millionaire, just can’t get over savagery toward women.
One more point about the depiction of violence toward women in this film, it is very shocking. It is shocking for an unique cultural reason. After a decade of slight petite, tiny women beating up or knocking out husky men with just one punch( think Holly Hunter on SAVING GRACE or BUFFY); it is shocking to see the real limits of women’s physical power in a fight between an average woman and a husky, slightly out of shape man.
The violence toward women in this film has not been politically scrubbed to show empowered women. As a brain washed audience, we are conditioned to empowered women, who know karate, and kung fu; it is unnerving and shocking to see how much physical damage a middle aged man can do on a young fit woman.
The violence in this film is shocking because it is a truthful depiction.
I understand this film will be remade shortly into an American version, in which probably, the violent scenes will be re-crafted so the female will have untold physical power. If they do that, those scenes of the true nature of violence against women will lose their power and impact.
C)ThE FILM ITSELF
It was a great joy to see new and different locales on the screen(it was shot in Sweden), with new and vibrant Viking faces.
The female lead, LISBETH was played by Noomi Rapace. WOW
Her performance was perfect, perfect, perfect and then pluperfect.
She gave her character the following traits: toughness, sexiness, vulnerability,brains,energy,wit,care,bewilderment.
And then, more than that, she made the leather jacketed, motorcycle riding, sodomized, bisexual, tattooed, nose pierced brat a Knight Errant, a Defender of Justice. It was the most amazing female performance I have seen in an eon.
When the male lead falls in love with her(a nifty performance by Michael Nyqvist), he first falls for her photographic memory then her sheer competence. Memo to young women, Competence is sexy.
He captures the total bewilderment of modern men as they deal with these forces of nature, modern women. His character has a great line in he film, addressed to the girl after love making, when she asks him to leave “How did you get like this?”
That is the modern male lament.
How do you control modern women, obviously not by tradition, nor money, nor social mores.
The Men Who Hate Women do it by violence.
The moral of the film is this, better to be a bewildered modern man than an abusive modern man.
I know I am late on this review, but like an idiot I went to see AVATAR first. Catch this Swedish film, if not in the theaters , then when it comes out on DVD.
The American version will only bastardize and denude it.
Noomi Rapace

Kelly and David Proval from IRENE IN TIME, ,

