I love historical dramas, I love costume dramas, I love dramas about British history, I love Robin Hood, I love Russell Crowe, and I love GLADIATOR.
So imagine my joyful anticipation as I set out, in the rain, to view the new Russell Crowe film, ROBIN HOOD. After seeing it, and paying SEVEN dollars for my medium sized popcorn, I still love Russell Crowe, just a lot less.
I admire Ridley Scott, I mean I was one of the three people who saw KINGDOM OF HEAVEN in a movie house.
Mr. Scott directed this version of ROBIN HOOD and KINGDOM OF HEAVEN, in both I found something lacking.
My enjoyment of ROBIN HOOD was reduced by playing catch the borrowed scene; I saw scenes borrowed from BRAVEHEART, BECKET,THE LAST SAMURAI, CONAN THE BARBARIAN,THE PATRIOT, GENGHIS KHAN, EL CID, HENRY V (Branagh’s version), HENRY V(Olivier’s version) and GLADIATOR. Even scenes from Uwe Boll’s triumphantly horrible adaption of a video game, IN THE NAME OF THE KING, DUNGEON SIEGE was thrown in. In fact I counted three times that the famous scene from GLADIATOR, in which Russell Crowe, while on his white horse is thrown a weapon, was replicated.
Even the white horse from GLADIATOR was replicated.
Two talents I admire do a film about a topic I am entranced by, and it is lacking. Why?
All you movie buffs out there, please do me a favor, go rent the DVD of the 1939 version of ROBIN HOOD starring Errol Flynn, Claude Rains and Olivia de Havilland. Put it on your DVD player, and then walk into the next room.
Don’t watch the film(even though it is visually stunning),listen to it.
The voices from those actors are enthralling; they are melodies from a symphony or a concerto, the bold, defiantly fresh voice of Errol Flynn, the sweet soothing voice of Olivia de Havilland and the slithering evil voice of Claude Rains, playing PRINCE JOHN.
Listen to Claude Rains play the evil PRINCE JOHN, with the tones of a snake come alive and you know the problem with both KINGDOM OF HEAVEN and ROBIN HOOD. The villains stunk.
In GLADIATOR, Russell Crowe had a great villain, Joaquin Phoenix, who only wanted two things in his life, slaughter and incest.
ROBIN HOOD had the most nondescript villains ever; I assume they figured that the audience would know the bad guy was evil because his head was shaved( like the bad guy in THE MUMMY). But film is not wrestling.
Film is a higher form of art; the villain does not have to be the strongest guy on the screen, or the best fighter. The best villains are never brutes but sophisticates. The best villains are not the ones who will ravish and rape our daughters; the best villains are those that, if you leave them in the room with your daughter, or wife, or mother will seduce and corrupt them.
In KINGDOM OF HEAVEN, Jeremy Irons,with his voice, would have been a perfect villain rather than a throw away second lead. If you were going to borrow anything from that Uwe Boll film, steal Matt Lillard. He played a wonderful villain in it, and would have made a weaselly Prince John.
What the old film makers knew then, and what we don’t practice now, is that evil is cool,seductive, fun….evil is the slick who runs the brute.
As I sat there watchng all those nondescript villains in this version of ROBIN HOOD, I hungered for James Mason, George Sanders, Robert Douglas, Henry Daniell, Zachary Scott and Anthony Hopkins from THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, actors with voices which could corrupt a convent.Evil is not in the look, or even the attitude,that is video game stuff; evil is in the voice, the mandate of film. Which is why George Lucas used the voice of James Earl Jones to punctuate the great evil of DARTH VADER( hey, I mean how evil would DARTH VADER have been with Woody Allen’s voice?).
I have three other quibbles with the film, since I am a quibbler.
Catholic bashing, I firmly believe I can Catholic bash with the best of the British atheist class, but I will not rewrite history to do it. Medieval Catholics did not cremate people; they buried people. Vikings cremated people. Hindus cremated people, pagan Romans cremated pecople. But Medieval Catholics, in the most Catholic time in world history, did not cremate people. Anyone interested enough to drag their asses to see a historical drama about medieval England, on a rainy day, knows that.
To see the medieval Catholic Sir Walter cremated in this film is a joke; it would be like showing a Medieval Muslim Salifist eating pork. The audience cannot be held in contempt.
The female actor who played ELEANOR OF AQUITAINE…Good luck lady…if you are going to follow Katherine Hepburn in one of the great roles ever for women, playing one of the great women of all time, get some verve in your performance. I mean Eleanor of Aquitaine is one of THE Women in history, a combination of Helen of Troy, MEDEA and LADY MacBETH.
Eleanor as a character and historical figure is wonderful, every actress who protrays her, should ENJOY that experience and let the audience share that enjoyment, just look how much fun, FUN Katherine Hepburn had playing Eleanor in THE LION IN WINTER. Just because you are in an historical drama does not mean you cannot have any fun.
Finally, Cate Blanchett. This is a great actor, I have been totally devoted to her since she had to fight off Dame Judy Dench’s attempts to rape the hell out of her in that sensationally great film NOTES ON A SCANDAL; which forgive me, I found to be one of the great comedies of all time.
This is the worst performance I have ever seen Ms. Blanchett give; though I tried to enjoy her playing peasant, and milking every cow in England.
Russell Crowe is a great actor.
Ridley Scott is a great Director.
Cate Blanchett is a great actress.
Go rent NOTES ON A SCANDAL.
SIDEBAR
“For much of history the Catholic Church banned cremation as a choice for dead Catholics, but in 1963 the Vatican lifted the ban. Cremation is now an acceptable practice for Catholics, but only if done for the right reasons.”
SIDEBAR II
ELEANOR of AQUITAINE
Eleanor of Aquitaine was one of the most powerful and fascinating personalities of feudal Europe. At age 15 she married Louis VII, King of France, bringing into the union her vast possessions from the River Loire to the Pyrenees. Eleanor, attended by 300 of her ladies, went on a Crusade with her husband King Louis, to help “tend the wounded.”
The presence of Eleanor, her ladies and wagons of female servants, was criticized by commentators throughout her adventure. Dressed in armor and carrying lances, she went Crusading.
The expedition did fail, and a defeated Eleanor and Louis returned to France in separate ships.
… In 1152 the marriage was annulled and her vast estates reverted to Eleanor’s control.
Eleanor became engaged to the eleven years younger Henry II, Duke of the Normans. On 18 May 1152, eight weeks after the annulment of her first marriage, Eleanor married the Duke of the Normans. On 25 October 1154 her husband ascended the throne of the Kingdom of England, making Eleanor Queen of the English. Over the next thirteen years, she bore Henry eight children: five sons, two of whom would become king, and three daughters. However, Henry and Eleanor eventually became estranged. She was imprisoned between 1173 and 1189 for supporting her son Henry’s revolt against her husband, King Henry II.
Eleanor was widowed on 6 July 1189. Her husband was succeeded by their son, Richard the Lionheart, who immediately moved to release his mother. Now queen mother, Eleanor acted as a regent for her son while he went off on the Third Crusade. Eleanor survived her son Richard and lived well into the reign of her youngest son King John. By the time of her death she had outlived all of her children except for King John and Eleanor, Queen of Castile.”
Claude Rains as PRINCE JOHN
The evil George Sanders making a radiant Elizabeth Taylor an offer she dare not refuse.

Dame Judi Dench showing her platonic love for Cate Blanchett in one of the best comedies ever, NOTES ON A SCANDAL.
Robert Douglas
Henry Daniell

The evil James Mason